May 26th, 2014
Ever since the war on drugs became a political and cultural issues in America, we have seemed to be unclear as to how to deal with the very human reality of dealing with those afflicted by addiction.
Too often “just say no,” became a mantra, not just about use, but about treatment and politics.
Addiction impacts 1 in 4 American families. Unfortunately, we’ve yet to fully comprehend what addiction is really about, or to develop a kinder and gentler and more scientifically modern way to deal with it.
My conversation with Dr. Jeffrey Foote:
May 26th, 2014
In spite of some interesting rhetoric and some self selecting experiments, like those done by Peter Thiel, along with the outlier careers of Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg, college is essential for success in today's workplace.
Pew’s recent statistics show that for those with only a high school diploma, the unemployment rate is over 12%. For those with a four year degree, it is 4%. But how did we get to an environment that on the one hand makes college the central pillar of economic success, in a knowledge based economy, and yet because of costs, pushes it further and further out of the reach of middle and lower socioeconomic groups?
My conversation with Suzanne Mettler:
May 26th, 2014
Throughout time there have always been those trying to stop the forces of progress. Fear of the new and fear of technology, has been the stuff of both horror and science fiction and of many dystopian visions of the future.
Today, too often in the name of good stewardship of our plant, there are those that believe we need a simpler world. One where we go back to the land, to the farm, to a kind of Thoreau like localism. The fact is the world is moving toward cities, technological progress is a force of nature that cannot be stopped and globalization is a genie that will not be put back into the proverbial bottle.
So how do we accept all of this, and still see a future that is livable, sustainable, and provides for our needs and still protects our food, our air, our water and our climate? The answer lies in technology and in innovation that is, as Robert Bryce says, Smaller Faster Lighter Denser Cheaper.
My conversation with Robert Bryce:
May 26th, 2014
The war on terror, that began on 9/11/2001 still goes on. The war in Afghanistan that began shortly after, that was once dubbed “the good war,” is America's longest war. Sadly the landscape of that nation today, does not reflect the either the lives or treasure that Americans gave to it.
War is always complicated. Once the battle is joined, the game plans often go out the window. Yet when one looks at the mistakes America made in Afghanistan, they were not so much about battle plans or strategy, they were a reflection of a fundamental misreading of history, culture, nuance and the reality of people being different than ourselves. In an interconnected and globalized world, this is and will continue to be a recipe for repeated disaster.
My conversation with Anand Goapl:
May 25th, 2014
Once upon a time protest mattered. People got angry at the actions of government and actually acted upon it. While the protests of today, like Tea Party rallies and Occupy Wall Street, often call attention to a problem, arguably they are not intended to do anything about it.
Back in 60’s and 70’s it was a very different story. Protests on behalf of Civil Rights and against the Vietnam War would reach a fever pitch. Buildings were seized, protests were both huge and personal. Draft cards were burned and protesters didn’t just spend a night in jail, but sometimes they went to prison for a long time.
What impact did it all have? Quite a bit. People and memoirs from both the Nixon and Johnson administrations show that the level of protest really did impact policy. One of those caught up in the times, in fact he is a Zelig like character throughout this period, is Bruce Dancis.
My conversation with Bruce Dancis:
May 23rd, 2014
Fifty years ago the nation passed the Civil Rights Act. Six years ago we elected an African American as President of the United States. Yet contrary to the hopes of many, we do not live in a post racial society. While gay rights and gay marriage are often seen as the civil right issues of our time, and yes remarkable progress has been made, we are also far from a post gay or post gender world.
The reality is, as racial differences have taught us, too much assimilation and tolerance are potential traps that can wipe out identity and water down the very differences that have been fought for.
My conversation with Suzanna Walters:
May 22nd, 2014
As the recent Jill Abramson kerfuffle at the New York Times, has shown, gender issues still impact the workplaces of even the most public and apparently tolerant of companies.
Perhaps in seeing that, and so many other examples, we might realize that we are approaching these issues in the wrong way. Diversity is not just about numbers, or quotas and expecting everyone to be the same. Homogenization is not diversity. Being forced to Lean In, is not about recognizing one's strengths, but about mimicking the strengths of others.
My conversation with Barbara Annis and Keith Merron:
May 22nd, 2014
Understanding history can be a two edged sword. On the one hand it is imperative that we understand the forces that have shaped nations and peoples. On the other hand, often when the present spends too much time sitting in judgment of the past, the future can be lost. So, how can we understand the shared narrative of the past, while dispelling myths and embracing a kind of proactive historical consciousness?
Nowhere is that more true than in Russia, and the nations of the former Soviet Union. It’s a place where the effort to reach escape velocity from the past seems forever limited by the gravitational pull of history, and a history that we are just beginning to understand. Helping us to try and understand this history is Russian expert Orlando Figes. His new book is Revolutionary Russia, 1891-1991: A History
My conversation with Orlando Figes:
May 21st, 2014
Today it is technology that brings “creative destruction” into our lives. Silicon Valley and its related communities sit at the epicenter of change. But in the 1960’s and 70’s it was very different. It was art and ideas and personalities that changed the world. In the art world, it was New York, the Museum of Modern Art and its Chief Curator Peter Selz, that sat at the epicenter of a changing cultural landscape
My conversation with Gabrielle Selz:
May 19th, 2014
Perhaps it’s the idea of 1.3 billion people. Or that half a billion have moved out of poverty in such a short time. Perhaps it’s that China is has moved so rapidly to become the world's second largest economy. Or perhaps it’s the environmental degradation left in the wake of these accomplishments.
Perhaps it’s all of these things and more, that often block our view of the humanity of China. Yet it is a nation of individuals. Individuals with personal stories, aspirations and ambitions. People who have learned to deal with the contradictions and disconnects, between a vibrant, 21st century economic system and a backwards, almost 19th century political system. Ironic, I suppose that it even sounds a little like the US.
My conversation with Evan Osnos:
May 18th, 2014
On the morning of August 7, 1974, forty years ago, Philippe Petit illegally strung a tightrope between the towers of New York's World Trade Center, then under construction. For 45 minutes, he performed a ballet in the sky, as he moved back and forth across the wire. He was more than 1300 feet above the ground – without a net. The story of this feat was captured in the Oscar-winning documentary "Man on Wire."
However powerful that feat was, in its own right, it was also a metaphor for the rebellion, chaos, organization, faith and fearlessness that would animate Petit’s life and which, if looked at in the wider context of today’s world, animates all that is good and necessary about change and progress and fear. Now Petit has taken his fearlessness and applied it to creativity in Creativity: The Perfect Crime
.
My conversation with Philippe Petit:
May 16th, 2014
Back in the 1960’s and 70’s we were deeply divided as a nation. Issues like Civil Rights, Vietnam and the Cold War created deep tensions. Yet in Washington, things did get done. The passage of the Civil Rights act, the creation of the EPA, and even public pressure to end the war in Vietnam, all impacted those who govern.
Today, Washington appears more divided and gridlocked than ever. Yet among the people, there seems to be less real division. The citizens seem to be more in sync than ever, about issues of corporate power, civil liberties, environmental concerns, and unchecked militarism.
So where is the disconnect, if the people have things in common, why are our leaders so divided? Perhaps the fault is not in our leaders but in ourselves and our unwillingness to engage in the exercise our own power.
My conversation with Ralph Nader:
May 14th, 2014
For the majority of the boomer generation, and generations that preceded it, work was mostly an obligation. A way of earning one's way in the world, a way of paying for the perceived American dream.
Today that’s changed. Today the work itself is often the object. For millennials, the work must have purpose. It must be fulfilling in its own right, and the efforts, even if it’s just a small part of the whole, must contribute to something bigger. Today, rather than the artificial construct of work/ life balance, work and life are merging into a seamless self actualized effort.
This is not just a psychological observation. In fact, this direction coupled with the growing information economy, is changing the very fabric of economic exchange. It’s creating what Aaron Hurst calls The Purpose Economy.
My conversation with Aaron Hurst:
May 13th, 2014
Today we have an all volunteer military. When young men and woman join the Marine Corps, they do so to serve their country. They know full well they the work may put them in harms way. That a bullet, or a grenade, or an IED might cut their life short, at any time. What none of them expect is to be killed or maimed by drinking water.
Yet that is exactly what has happened to Marines at the historic Camp Lejeune facility in North Carolina. As many as a million people connected with the base were exposed to highly toxic and contaminated well water. What the military and government has done about it, is truly a crime.
My conversation with Mike Magner:
May 12th, 2014
Think about advertising for new cars. Better yet, think about looking at a new car in the showroom. That experience is all about possibilities and dreams. It’s about what that car can do for you, not just where it will take you geographically, but where it will take you emotionally.
From the days of Mad Men, right up to today, that’s what the car dream has always been about. But usually, like the real disconnect between dreams and life, the car takes on a life of its own. It's often far removed from the ad or the showroom fantasy.
My conversation with Earl Swift:
May 11th, 2014
Particularly in the First World, it's amazing how fragile our world is. Remember how upset we get if our cell phones don't work, or our computers get glitchy? So imagine if the electrical grid collapsed, or the fuel or food supply was curtailed, only for a few days, much less, some far more devastating apocalyptic kind of event?
We see it in natural disasters, like tsunamis, or earthquakes, or floods or tornadoes. We get a glimpse, but only a glimpse, of what might happen. But are we prepared for any of these kinds of disasters, or should we be?
Were Katrina and New Orleans and Sandy only outliers or a harbinger? And if it is the later, what should we know about trying to survive in a post apocalyptic world?
My conversation with Lewis Dartnell:
May 8th, 2014
When the nuclear age dawned, people spoke of being “present at the creation.” Man suddenly had the ability to completely remake the world anew, or even to destroy it. Today, we have that same power. The environmental crises we face, driven by the pillars of population growth, technology and short term thinking, also give us the power to destroy the world.
My conversation with Elizabeth Kolbert:
May 6th, 2014
Back in the 1980’s we thought Japan was not only the number one economic power, but we thought it was taking over the world. The Japanese bought iconic properties like Rockefeller Center, and Pebble Beach. We were looking at Japanese schooling and trying to emulate their educational and economic success. Just as we want our kids to learn Mandarin today, back then we wanted them to learn Japanese.
All that has changed. Japan’s economy has spent twenty years in the doldrums. The Japanese population is aging, and it’s been anything but a dynamic society.
How are all of these events related? How does the rise of China, the stagnation of Japan and the insecurities of the US all fit together? And how has Japan, especially since the multiple and overlapping tragedies of Fukushima, been able to cope with its place in the world?
My conversation with David Pilling:
May 3rd, 2014
Few events truly define the complexity of the American experience. Yet the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, comes very close.
At its core, it address the founding flaw in the American republic, in taking up the issue of race itself. It incorporates the moral underpinnings and power of religion, faith and morality in the American character. And further, its shows the best in the system of self government, designed by our founders, to allow conflict, and compromise and the better angels of our nature to foster action that may not be politically expedient.
In this sense, our focus on this Act, fifty years ago, is not so much nostalgia, but perhaps longing for what we once were able to do.
My conversation with Todd Purdum:
May 2nd, 2014
This is the season in which high school seniors start receiving college admissions, and begin the run up to High School graduation. Given that gallons and gallons of self esteem have been poured into these kids, every one of them thinks that they are special. David McCullough, Jr has a bit of a different idea. Those ideas were a part of a High School commencement speech that he gave back in 2012. The YouTube of that speech has been viewed over two and a half million times.
My conversation with David McCullough, Jr.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
